Former U.S. Olympian David Hearn and his attorneys returned to courtroom to induce the choose who beforehand oversaw his Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool vandalism case to formally bar federal prosecutors from seeking new charges against him.
In late July, the D.C. U.S. Lawyer’s Workplace moved to dismiss the criminal case against Hearn in a submitting that acknowledged harm to the Reflecting Pool “was the results of flawed set up” and never the work of vandals — prompting outrage from President Donald Trump.
Former Olympian David Hearn stands together with his lawyer Norman Eisen as he speaks to reporters and protestors gathered after his arraignment at Moultrie Courthouse, July 9, 2026, in Washington, D.C.
Finn Gomez/Getty Pictures
However the movement from U.S. Lawyer Jeanine Pirro requested the choose overseeing Hearn’s case, Todd Edelman, to dismiss the indictment “with out prejudice,” which would go away the door open for prosecutors to doubtlessly search to re-charge Hearn.
Hearn’s attorneys have argued a sequence of statements from Trump and different officers within the weeks after Pirro’s movement that falsely accused him and others of vandalizing the pool warrants dismissal of the case “with prejudice” — successfully shutting the door for prosecutors to cost him once more.
“U.S. Lawyer Jeanine Pirro ought to re-visit her rapidly made choice [to dismiss Hearn’s indictment],” Trump stated in an Aug. 7 publish on social media.
In Friday’s listening to, Decide Edelman pressed an lawyer from Pirro’s workplace, Michael Spence, on why prosecutors would object to dismissing the case with prejudice after they’ve acquired no proof up to now suggesting something Hearn did was against the law.
Staff drain storm water out of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool on September 04, 2026 in Washington, DC.
Finn Gomez/Getty Pictures
“I do not know what the long run will convey — none of us do,” Spence answered, including if proof did finally floor, “there isn’t any cause this courtroom ought to tie the arms of a future grand jury to convey that indictment.”
“The place is it gonna come from?” Edelman requested.
“That I do not know,” Spence answered.
When requested by Edelman whether or not prosecutors have been nonetheless investigating Hearn’s conduct, Spence stated they weren’t.
“The U.S. Lawyer’s Workplace shouldn’t be, no,” Spence answered.
At one level, Edelman zeroed in on Trump’s public feedback about Hearn’s case and his public options he may fireplace Pirro if she would not revisit her choice to drop the case.
“How do I conclude these statements as something apart from assertion by the chief government urging your workplace to pursue a prosecution that you’ve got informed me is meritless?” Edelman pressed. “Is not this a reasonably distinctive menace of not simply re-prosecution however meritless re-prosecution?”
“I believe, Your Honor, it is untimely to even get there as a result of there has not — this case has been dropped. It has not been submitted to a brand new grand jury for an indictment,” Spence replied.
Spence argued that even when the federal government did in some unspecified time in the future transfer to re-charge him, the grand jury course of would function a type of safety guaranteeing he would not be charged based mostly on no proof.
“How may Mr. Hearn have a look at this case and make that conclusion?” Edelman requested with clear skepticism, noting Hearn was beforehand indicted in a case the federal government now concedes was baseless.
“We believed based mostly on the proof that we had on the time that we had possible trigger, and the grand jury agreed that we did have possible trigger,” Spence answered.
