With the 2025 tax season now behind us, it might be price your time over the summer season months to log in to your Canada Revenue Agency account to view all the 2025 T-slips that the CRA has on file so that you can be certain that you’ve absolutely captured, and reported, your entire revenue for 2025. That is notably vital for individuals who filed early, particularly in case you used CRA’s auto-fill feature earlier than all of your slips showed up online . The aim is to catch any revenue omissions and adjust your return , earlier than the company catches you in CRA’s annual matching program .
Failure to report revenue, even when it’s the results of a purely harmless mistake, may give rise to penalties and curiosity. That’s what occurred to 1 taxpayer who appeared earlier than the federal court docket in Vancouver in late Might, searching for a judicial assessment of a call of the CRA denying her request for aid from penalties and curiosity.
Earlier than delving into the info of the case, let’s assessment the foundations for omitting revenue. Below the Income Tax Act , in case you fail to report at the very least $500 of revenue in a tax 12 months, and in any of the three preceding taxation years , you will be hit with a “repeated failure to report revenue” federal penalty. That is calculated because the lesser of 10 per cent of the unreported revenue, and 50 per cent of the distinction between the understatement of tax (or the overstatement of tax credit) associated to the omission, and the quantity of any tax paid in respect of the unreported quantity, for instance, by an employer by means of supply deductions withheld. A corresponding provincial 10 per cent penalty can be usually assessed.
For instance, in case you forgot to report greater than $500 of revenue you obtained in 2025, and likewise forgot to report greater than $500 in revenue in any of your 2022, 2023 or 2024 returns, you will be hit with this failure-to-report penalty.
Within the latest case, the taxpayer filed her 2021 income tax return in early March 2022. She failed to incorporate two T5 slips from TD Waterhouse and Equitable Financial institution that she says she obtained solely after she had filed her return. Upon noticing this omission, the CRA reassessed her however didn’t impose a penalty.
Sadly, the same scenario arose in 2023 when the taxpayer filed her 2022 revenue tax return in late March 2023, however inadvertently omitted T5 slips from TD Waterhouse, claiming the slips weren’t accessible on the CRA’s auto-fill service when she used industrial software program to organize her return. For the 2022 tax 12 months, her undeclared revenue was greater than $23,000. She was subsequently reassessed by the CRA in October 2023, and a penalty of $2,925 was utilized, together with $636 in non-deductible arrears curiosity.
After receiving her reassessment discover, with the penalty and curiosity, the taxpayer utilized to the CRA beneath the taxpayer relief provisions of the Act. Three successive choices have been made, by totally different CRA officers, denying her request for aid. The latest judicial assessment surrounded the third choice during which the CRA officer had famous that the company had obtained the omitted slips earlier than the top of February 2023. It had processed them in April 2023, in order that they’d have been accessible to the taxpayer earlier than the deadline to file her 2022 revenue tax return, being April 30, 2023.
In the course of the six months that elapsed between the second the slips have been accessible and the time that CRA reassessed the taxpayer, the taxpayer didn’t right the omission. Because the CRA officer wrote, “This was not a scenario past her management, particularly as a result of she communicated a number of occasions with the CRA to ask for different changes to be made to her return throughout this era.”
The CRA officer went on to say that even when the taxpayer hadn’t obtained the mandatory slips earlier than April 30, she ought to have estimated her revenue primarily based on statements from her monetary establishment which present the revenue earned in the course of the 12 months. Because of this, the CRA denied her request for aid, so the taxpayer turned to court .
As in prior such circumstances, the position of the federal court docket is restricted in that it doesn’t have the discretion to vary the CRA’s choice merely as a result of the choose disagrees with it. Somewhat, the federal court docket can solely intervene if the taxpayer exhibits that the choice was “unreasonable.”
In court docket, the taxpayer argued that she acted “diligently and in good religion,” and that her failure to declare sure quantities in her revenue was because of the fault of her monetary establishment’s failure to challenge her digital T5 slips in time. She argued that taxpayers must be notified when new info turns into accessible on the CRA’s auto-fill service, in any other case, how are they to know if a brand new slip was later added?
The choose famous that every one these components have been, certainly, thought of by the CRA when making its choice to disclaim curiosity and penalty aid, however the CRA officer concluded that numerous different components, such because the magnitude of the quantity omitted, and the truth that this was the second time the taxpayer didn’t report revenue, “tipped the scales in favour of denying aid.”
Because the choose reminded us, “It’s all the time the accountability of the taxpayer to file an correct revenue tax return. … Even when they use industrial software program or the CRA’s auto-fill function, taxpayers should be certain that all their revenue is said. It’s cheap to anticipate taxpayers to have information of their sources of revenue.”
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com .
In the event you favored this story, sign up for more within the FP Investor publication.
