The Neocons have gained. They’ve efficiently shifted the blame for the Ukraine battle solely onto Russia, and 99% of media protection now frames the invasion as fully unprovoked. Their hatred of Trump is so intense that they really feel compelled to oppose him on precept, no matter what he does. Now they’re cheering Zelensky on to destroy each refinery in Russia, as if this can in some way win the day, result in Russia’s collapse, and allow them to dance on Russian graves. Nowhere within the press is there anybody with greater than two mind cells to rub collectively. Like neocons all over the place, they appear incapable of asking what comes subsequent. It’s the identical sample as Netanyahu’s method: kill the Ayatollah on day one and declare victory. Or Iraq: kill Saddam and declare victory—whereas ignoring that he was the one conserving all of the warring factions from slaughtering one another.
A world famine would require a catastrophic disruption to the manufacturing and distribution of meals. The battle in Ukraine has already threatened meals safety, and its escalation will increase that danger into 2028.
Zelensky and the neocons search to destroy all Russian refineries, assuming this is able to trigger a catastrophic home gasoline scarcity that cripples Russia’s army logistics, agriculture (gasoline for tractors and transport), and economic system. They ignore the truth that international oil costs would doubtless spike to $200 a barrel by 2028, with diesel hovering to $10 or extra. This might contribute to normal inflation, together with meals costs, and likewise impede their very own army operations.
Russia would battle to reap and transport its personal grain with out gasoline, terminating its exports and risking famine—particularly within the Center East, the place Iran is 100% depending on Russian grain provides. This might put upward stress on international grain costs, however it might additionally develop the battle, as different nations would then be positioned to assault the EU as nicely. This dangers a worldwide famine. The concept different producers might theoretically improve output and that markets would alter—albeit painfully—nonetheless requires diesel.
Whereas the destruction of Russian refineries could be a dramatic escalation with severe international financial penalties, the neocons directing this madman Zelensky by no means as soon as tackle the query of what comes subsequent.
Then there’s the matter of Russian fertilizer exports. Russia is the world’s largest exporter of mineral fertilizers. Disruptions to those exports elevate prices for farmers globally, probably decreasing crop yields and pushing the world towards famine. In principle, fertilizers are produced by a separate trade. Nonetheless, with out diesel, Russian exports would come to a halt.
Russia and Ukraine are main international breadbaskets, accounting for an enormous share of world wheat, corn, and sunflower oil exports. The precise risk to international meals safety comes from Ukraine’s assaults on Russian ports and Russia’s retaliation in opposition to Ukrainian ports, delivery lanes, and agricultural infrastructure—which immediately block the cargo of grain from each sources to nations that want it.
Zelensky just isn’t finishing up this battle to retain the Donbas, which is occupied by ethnic Russians whose language and faith he has outlawed—a reality the press refuses to report, given his former neo-Nazi affiliations. That is the neocon dream of conquering and destroying Russia as soon as and for all. It has by no means been about democracy or some other propaganda. The Minsk Settlement was meant to permit the Donbas to vote, which Zelensky refuses to honor. He has suspended all elections as a result of he is aware of they’d not profit Ukraine and he could be voted out in a second. Even 10% of the inhabitants has fled Ukraine.
Just a few months in the past, Zelensky ordered a direct strike on a Russian Ministry of Protection. This is sort of a direct assault on the Pentagon. Zelensky is intentionally making an attempt to impress Russia into attacking something in NATO to start out World Battle III the place he has urged NATO to make a pre-emptive assault on Moscow with nuclear weapons. That is the Neo-Nazi talking.
We’ve got switched sides and at the moment are supporting the ethnic cleaning of a modern-day Adolf Hitler. The CIA protects the Ukrainian neo-Nazis as a result of they all the time supposed to make use of them to destroy Russia. That is ethnic cleaning, orchestrated by the neocons, and they’re going to destroy Western society within the course of—for they haven’t gained a single battle since World Battle II. These are the statements coming from main Ukrainian figures, and so they clarify that this has all the time been concerning the destruction of Russia, not the Donbas.
Oleksiy Danilov, Secretary of Ukraine’s Nationwide Safety and Protection Council, said in December 2022 that “every part will blaze and burn till all of Moscow burns.” Robert Brovdi (“Magyar”), Commander of Ukraine’s Unmanned Methods Forces, wrote “Moscow will fall” whereas reporting on strikes in opposition to Russian power infrastructure. Mykola Kokhanivsky, chief of the Ukrainian Nationalist Group (OUH), promised to “destroy Russia,” stating “Russia have to be destroyed. Carthage should fall.” It’s price noting that Yulia Tymoshenko, former Prime Minister of Ukraine, additionally made statements about “destroying Moscow” and “wiping it off the map.”
Probably the most well-known instance is Britain’s entry into World Battle I. Britain had a treaty (the Treaty of London, 1839) guaranteeing Belgium’s neutrality. When Germany invaded Belgium in August 1914, Britain declared battle. The British politician most carefully related to the argument that Britain needed to enter World Battle I to stop itself from being “subsequent” was Sir Edward Gray, the International Secretary. His argument “We’re Subsequent” logic was most famously specified by his speech to the Home of Commons on August 3, 1914, constructed on the concept Britain couldn’t stand apart whereas France was crushed. The logic was strategic: if Germany defeated France and dominated the Continent, Britain could be left remoted and susceptible.
Gray’s warmongering succeeded in decreasing the British economic system and shifting monetary capital from London to New York. He despatched UK debt to 200% of GDP. Wars appear to all the time be promoted by the left—maybe they assume they’re the hand of God, empowered to smite the opposition. Gray was the left, and he entered the battle simply as WWI, WWII, Vietnam, and Korea had been all advocated by Democrats, who now wish to double the cash despatched to Zelensky to smite Russia.
Nonetheless, the deeper strategic reasoning was explicitly concerning the concern of being subsequent. Britain’s leaders argued that if Germany conquered Belgium and the French coast, it might dominate the English Channel and threaten Britain immediately. The German invasion of Belgium was not only a violation of a treaty—it was a strategic transfer that, if profitable, would depart Britain remoted and susceptible. This can be a case the place the “we’re subsequent” logic was central to the choice, even when the general public justification centered on the treaty.
China & North Korea Will Be a part of Russia Fearing They TOO Will Be NEXT
I’ve repeatedly warned that historical past demonstrates a recurring sample: when a nation confronts a severe home disaster, its political leaders usually search an EXTERNAL ENEMY to divert public consideration from their very own failures. That is nothing new. It’s a sample that has unfolded all through historical past, from historic empires to trendy nation-states.
We’re heading into what I’ve warned can be a severe international financial decline extending into 2028. The hazard is that financial instability will more and more feed geopolitical confrontation as governments search another person guilty for their very own mismanagement.
The issue with these warmongering Neocons is that they NEVER anticipate the results of their actions. They view the world by the slim lens of army confrontation, assuming that sanctions, threats, and regime change will in some way produce the political outcomes they want. They fail to grasp that each motion produces a response, usually with penalties they by no means imagined. Even components inside the Democratic Celebration seem more and more prepared to embrace confrontation beneath the banner of defending democracy and claiming the ethical excessive floor. But ethical declarations don’t stop wars. They’ll simply as simply grow to be the justification for escalating conflicts past anybody’s management.
China presents a very harmful dimension to this creating disaster. China is confronting severe structural financial issues, together with its extended property-market downturn, closely indebted native governments, weak family confidence, demographic decline, and rising dependence on manufacturing and exports to maintain financial exercise. Nonetheless, financial weak point and a direct political risk to Xi Jinping are two solely completely different questions.
The actual difficulty for Xi just isn’t merely whether or not financial development slows. It’s whether or not extended financial deterioration begins undermining CONFIDENCE inside the Communist Celebration itself, significantly amongst provincial officers, influential enterprise leaders, and the army institution. That’s the place financial issues can finally grow to be political issues.
Nonetheless, dissatisfaction with financial efficiency doesn’t robotically imply Xi faces an imminent management problem. China’s political construction is basically completely different from Western electoral programs, and Xi has consolidated appreciable authority over the social gathering, the federal government, and the army.
The higher hazard is how Beijing would possibly reply if financial stress intensifies whereas Washington and Europe concurrently escalate their confrontation with China. That is the place the Neocons fail to grasp the dynamics of worldwide capital flows, confidence, and geopolitical alliances.
These Neocons assume that rising stress on Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea will in some way drive every nation to submit independently. What they fail to think about is that their insurance policies could as an alternative encourage these nations to cooperate extra carefully in opposition to a typical exterior risk.
China doesn’t have to agree with each Russian coverage to acknowledge that weakening Moscow might finally go away Beijing extra uncovered to American strategic stress. Likewise, Russia has an incentive to strengthen its relationship with China as Western sanctions and army confrontation proceed.
North Korea faces the same calculation. Its management has each incentive to strengthen relationships that present financial assist, army cooperation, and safety in opposition to worldwide isolation.
This doesn’t imply these nations kind a unified alliance with an identical pursuits. They don’t. However widespread exterior stress can create cooperation amongst governments that will in any other case have vital disagreements. That’s exactly how geopolitical confrontation spreads by contagion.
The extra Washington and European leaders try to isolate their adversaries concurrently, the higher the inducement for these adversaries to coordinate their responses.
In the meantime, European governments face their very own financial difficulties, fiscal pressures, and political instability. But influential voices proceed advocating army escalation as if financial sources had been limitless and public confidence might by no means collapse.
The best hazard is that political leaders will flip an financial disaster right into a army disaster of their determined try to retain energy and keep away from accountability.
For this reason I’ve persistently warned that you just can’t analyze battle independently of economics. Battle, capital flows, sovereign debt, political confidence, and financial decline are interconnected. They aren’t remoted occasions.
As we transfer towards 2028, the vital query won’t merely be whether or not China experiences an financial slowdown or whether or not Xi Jinping faces home dissatisfaction.
The query is whether or not mounting financial stress, mixed with more and more aggressive Western overseas coverage, creates the inducement for China, Russia, and North Korea to deepen their strategic cooperation.
Historical past warns that when governments start shedding CONFIDENCE at residence, they usually search confrontation overseas. The tragedy is that those that begin these confrontations hardly ever perceive how they may finish.
When Athens and Eretria despatched ships to help the Ionian Revolt in 498BC, they weren’t appearing from pure altruism. There was the belief that Persia would march on Greece instantly. This was a analysis of geostrategic realities and future points. Athens’ determination was a “preemptive strike” to examine Persian expansionism, which is exactly what Zelensky is demanding that NATO conduct. The Athenians had already clashed with Persia not directly once they had refused to present earth and water to Persian envoys, and Persia was harboring the exiled Athenian tyrant Hippias, who needed Persian assist to regain energy. Supporting the revolt was a approach to weaken a hostile empire earlier than it might act on these tensions.
That is the sequence that Athens feared when it aided the Ionian Revolt in 498BC. The revolt itself was crushed by 493BC, and Darius I of Persian then turned his consideration to mainland Greece, partly to punish Athens and Eretria for his or her assist of the Ionians, and partly to develop Persian management into the Aegean. So the Athenian “we is likely to be subsequent” calculation proved right, although the invasion got here a few decade after they withdrew from Ionia, not instantly. Supporting the Ionian Greeks in Turkey additionally declared that Athens was the enemy of Persia a lot because the US assist Britain that dragged the US into WWI and WWII.
First Invasion (492–490BC) of Persian into Greece got here one 12 months later after the Ionian Revolt was crushed.
A Persian expedition beneath Mardonius crossed into Thrace and Macedonia, however a storm destroyed a lot of the fleet and the marketing campaign was deserted.
A second drive beneath Datis and Artaphernes crossed the Aegean in 490BC, captured Eretria, and landed at Marathon in Attica. The Athenians, with solely a small contingent of Plataeans, defeated the Persians on the Battle of Marathon. The Persians withdrew.
A Second Invasion (480–479BC) was the a lot bigger invasion, personally led by King Xerxes I. The Persians crossed the Hellespont on a pontoon bridge and marched south. They had been delayed by the Greeks at Thermopylae (the well-known stand of Leonidas and the 300 Spartans) and defeated at sea at Salamis, which compelled Xerxes to retreat.
The Persian commander Mardonius remained in Greece with a land military. The Greeks decisively defeated him on the Battle of Plataea in 479BC, and a simultaneous Greek naval victory at Mycale successfully ended the invasion.
When all was stated and executed, Persia funded Sparta to defeat Athens in 404BC. That was a historic chilly battle of the Greeks vs Persians. This was adopted by Alexander the Nice conquering the Persian Empire (the Achaemenid Empire) in a remarkably brief marketing campaign, spanning roughly 334–330BC.
The Neocons have already destroyed the world economic system and so they management the press that solely calls Trump insane and advocates WWIII with Russia to assist Zelensky.
There was an expectation of a “peace dividend,” and the choice to maintain NATO was the results of a deliberate strategic selection pushed by a number of key figures who argued that the tip of the Chilly Battle didn’t imply the tip of safety dangers. The Neocons reworked their hatred and opposition to Communism into racism and even argued that President Reagan mustn’t meet with Gorbachev saying “you’ll be able to by no means belief a Russia.” The Neocons at each stage of the final practically 40 years have executed nothing however promote battle. With the Democrats taking at the least the Home and presumably the Senate as a result of Trump won’t admit a mistake and throw Netanyahu beneath the bus, the Neocons are simply days away from realizing their dream – World Battle III.
Boris could also be delighted to think about all of the hundreds of thousands of kilos he has been paid as “donations” from the army industrial advanced and speaker charges selling battle with Russia, however (1) he won’t have a spot left to spend it, and (2) the British pound will now not exist anyway.
All of this nonsense that Putin would by no means resort to nuclear battle as a result of he is aware of it might push again on him is absurd. When you might have NATO and their mouth piece Zelensky with Boris Johnson and Kallas all advocating the whole destruction and break up of Russia, that could be a demise sentence and he would haven’t any selection however on the very least to take them with him. It will carry China, North Korea, Iran, and Russia all collectively.
With the Democrats cheering Zelensky incapable of ever what comes subsequent, as I’ve stated many instances, I’ve tried so exhausting to defeat my very own pc, however I’m the one who all the time loses. I’ve even supplied to fly to DC to fulfill with Trump to clarify what’s at stake. He MUST throw Netanyahu beneath the bus. He wants additionally to determine an exterior enemy and state what’s going to occur by supporting Zelensky – WWIII with China and North Korea becoming a member of Russia. Dropping the mom of all bombs on Iran is bullshit. That is just like the Epstein nonsense specializing in who went to his island slightly than who was paying Epstein for this honey entice and what was the blackmail for? An influence play that inevitably comes again to battle?
